Tuesday, August 29, 2023

Man in Prison Stole Millions

 


How a Man in Prison Stole Millions from Billionaires

With smuggled cell phones and a handful of accomplices, Arthur Lee Cofield, Jr., took money from large bank accounts and bought houses, cars, clothes, and gold.
Illustration of an IPhone showing modern home on the screen surrounding the phone shows a prison.
Illustration by Max Guther

Early in 2020, the architect Scott West got a call at his office, in Atlanta, from a prospective client who said that his name was Archie Lee. West designs luxurious houses in a spare, angular style one might call millionaire modern. Lee wanted one. That June, West found an appealing property in Buckhead—an upscale part of North Atlanta that attracts both old money and new—and told Lee it might be a good spot for them to build. Lee arranged for his wife to meet West there.

She arrived in a white Range Rover, wearing Gucci and Prada, and carrying a small dog in her purse. She said her name was Indiana. As she walked around the property, she FaceTimed her husband, then told West that it wasn’t quite what they had in mind, and that he should keep looking. West said that he’d need a retainer. She reached into her purse and pulled out five thousand dollars. “That was a little unusual,” West recalled.

Later that summer, Lee called again, with a new proposal. His wife, he said, had been “driving around Buckhead, and she came across this amazing modern house and thought it had to be a Scott West house.” She was right. The house, on Randall Mill Road, wasn’t quite finished, and it had not been on the market—but Lee told West that he was already buying it, from the owner, for four and a half million dollars. Now he wanted West to redo the landscaping and the outdoor pool, plus some interior finishes. West took another retainer, but he had other clients to attend to, and Lee grew impatient. Eventually, Lee asked West for his money back and began planning the renovations without him.

The renovations were supervised, as far as the neighbors could tell, by Indiana’s father, Eldridge Bennett, a sturdy man who drove an old Jaguar and wore a pair of dog tags around his neck. Neighbors described him as friendly but hard to pin down. He told one that he worked in the concrete business—and that he’d been on the team that killed Osama bin Laden—but gave another a card that identified him as the marketing manager for an accounting company. This neighbor noticed that a wine tower in the house was being stocked with Moët & Chandon (“thousands of bottles, like, twenty feet tall”) and asked who was paying for it all. Bennett told him that the new owner was in California, “working on music stuff.” Like many residents of Randall Mill Road, this neighbor is white. The Bennetts are Black. “It seemed like they didn’t come from money,” the neighbor said, “but they had sure found a lot of it.”

A closing meeting was scheduled for early September at a bank in Alpharetta, north of the city. By then, Lee and the Bennetts had made three down payments on the house, totalling seven hundred thousand dollars, most of which Indiana and Eldridge had delivered in rubber-banded bundles of cash. Lee told the seller’s attorney that they would deliver the rest—about three and a half million dollars—in similar fashion, at the closing. He couldn’t be there himself, he said, because he was still busy in California. (Lee, the lawyer recalled, said that he “represented a variety of entertainers and got paid in a variety of ways,” and also that he’d made money in Bitcoin.)

Because so much cash was going to be exchanged, the bank arranged for the closing to be held in its kitchen and break room, which offered some privacy. The bank also asked a local cop to be present. At the appointed time, Eldridge and a younger man carried several black duffelbags into the room and began handing stacks of bills to a bank employee, who spent the next three and a half hours counting them all. Afterward, on the phone, Lee asked the seller to complete a few punch items on the property. When the seller got to the house, he noticed that the door to a large safe that he’d installed—and which he’d left open—was locked, and that the combination had already been changed.

A few weeks after the close, Lee sent Scott West another e-mail. “I’m buying land in a month or so to start planning on designing a house 100% to my liking,” he wrote. “I want to give you the ball and let you run the entire project. Let you go insane on your ideas. I’m thinking of a seven million dollar budget just for the house, not including the landscaping.” He suggested that the two of them “become a team.” West replied, as gently as he could, that he was too busy. A week before, he’d received a call from a federal agent, who asked him if he knew a man named Arthur Cofield. West said that he did not, and the agent began rattling off names. “He kept going through aliases until he said ‘Archie Lee,’ ” West told me. Arthur Lee Cofield, Jr., the agent said, resided in a maximum-security prison in Georgia. He had been incarcerated for more than a decade.

Arthur Cofield probably stole more money from behind bars than any inmate in American history. His methods were fairly straightforward, if distinctly contemporary: using cell phones that he’d had smuggled into prison, and relying on a network of people on the outside, he accessed the bank accounts of the very wealthy, then used their money to make large purchases—often of gold, which he’d typically have shipped to Atlanta, where it was picked up by his accomplices. Some of that gold he seems to have converted to cash: he and his associates bought cars, houses, and clothes, and they flaunted all of it on social media. (At one point, Cofield wrote on Instagram, “Making millions from bed.”) By the time Cofield was charged—with identity theft and money laundering, among other crimes—he had likely stolen at least fifteen million dollars. “I don’t know of anything that’s ever happened in an institutional setting of this magnitude,” Brenda Smith, a law professor at American University who has researched crime in prison, told me. Cofield, she said, was “something of an innovator.”

He didn’t arrive in prison as a man with a lot of connections or a history of fraud. He didn’t have much history at all—he was just sixteen. He had grown up in East Point, a poor and predominantly Black suburb southeast of Atlanta. A number of gangs operate there, but, if Cofield belonged to one back then, no one seems to have noticed. When he was a kid, dirt bikes were his passion. He began riding at a motocross track northwest of the city when he was little; at eight, he finished fourth at the Amateur National Motocross Championship, in Tennessee. A friend from his riding days told me that Cofield stuck out among the motocross crowd for two reasons: “He was African American, and he was freaking badass.” Cofield told the friend that he was called racial slurs by fans and other racers. “Nasty stuff,” the friend said. “It almost fuelled the fire.”

Competing in motocross is expensive, and Cofield’s father, who mostly made his living hanging drywall, converted a box truck into a trailer, with living quarters, so that the family could get Arthur to the big races. At one of those races, when Cofield was about fourteen, a gate collector noticed that more than eight thousand dollars had gone missing from the till, and told the track’s operators that Cofield had been lingering nearby when it vanished. “We went into Arthur’s mobile home and he had the money hidden in there,” a member of the family who owned the track told me. The family was fond of Cofield and his father, and declined to press charges, but it was the last time that they saw the Cofields at a race. Soon, Cofield began to “slack off from racing,” his friend said, adding, “That’s when everything happened.”

In October, 2007, when Cofield was sixteen, he brought a gun into a bank in Douglasville, just west of Atlanta, and demanded that the tellers give him all the money they had. He walked out with twenty-six hundred dollars and headed for a stolen station wagon, where a friend of his older brother’s was behind the wheel. A smoke-and-dye pack hidden in a stack of bills exploded as he got into the car; the young men crashed soon after getting on the road. They ran but didn’t get far. The driver was sentenced to ten years and was paroled after three. Cofield got a fourteen-year prison sentence and ended up in a maximum-security facility in middle Georgia.

It took a few years and a couple of prison transfers before he became a more successful thief. Early in 2010, Cofield sustained cuts on his arm from a razor blade; according to a prison report, he initially told a guard that he’d cut himself shaving. But he later handwrote a carefully argued lawsuit alleging that he’d been attacked by a fellow-inmate and that prison staff had not only failed to intervene but knowingly allowed the assault to take place. Citing the damage to his motocross career, which he slightly embellished, he demanded more than a million dollars. A judge dismissed the suit on procedural grounds. Cofield was sent to another prison. Later that year, he was mailed a package containing bottles of shampoo and conditioner. Inside each bottle was a cell phone.

As smartphones have become more powerful and more ubiquitous, the barrier between life in prison and life on the outside has become more porous. Thousands of phones are confiscated from Georgia prisons every year, according to the state’s Department of Corrections. Prison guards are generally not well paid, and they are often bribed to assist in the smuggling or simply to look the other way. Most people in prison use phones in innocuous ways: to talk to loved ones, for instance—prison phone services are notoriously expensive—and to keep up with what’s going on in the world. In 2010, inmates at seven Georgia prisons used smuggled cell phones to organize a protest for better living conditions. But phones are also used to carry out drug dealing and other crimes. Authorities have recognized this problem for more than a decade now, but the phones keep coming.

In the years that followed Cofield’s first prison transfer, he was found with phones in his soapbox, taped around his waist, and inside his undershorts. Many more seem to have gone undiscovered. On one occasion, he told a guard seizing yet another phone, “I don’t give a fuck about that phone. I’ve had hundreds of phones.”

In 2014, he was transferred again, to Telfair State Prison, in south Georgia. There he met a man named Devinchio Rogers, who was serving a seven-year sentence for manslaughter. Rogers grew up not far from Cofield, but he was a few years older, and flashier. Cofield is stocky and gruff—he was lean and muscular in his motocross days but put on weight in prison. Rogers was tall and stylish. He shared Cofield’s knack for getting cell phones behind bars. He’d attained some brief local notoriety in 2011, when he began tweeting from inside Fulton County Jail. (His tweets were “littered with foul language and pictures of prison food, something that appears to be marijuana and himself,” a local TV station reported.)

Cofield and Rogers started a crew, which they called yap, for Young and Paid. There are dozens, if not hundreds, of similar crews in Atlanta, many with three-letter names, most of them small-time. They are typically founded in prisons or on particular city blocks. Some are involved in the drug trade; some flaunt a connection to nationally known gangs, such as the Bloods; some aspire to be movers and shakers in hip-hop. The most famous of these crews is Y.S.L., which was allegedly co-founded by the rapper Young Thug, whose real name is Jeffery Williams. Like Cofield, Williams, who is Cofield’s age, grew up in East Point. He and more than two dozen other alleged members of Y.S.L. are currently facing rico charges in Fulton County. They stand accused of crimes that range from drug dealing to murder. (Williams, who started a record label also called Y.S.L., has denied involvement in criminal activity.)

Cofield and Rogers adopted aliases, like hip-hop m.c.s, incorporating the name of their crew. Rogers went by yap Football, or just Ball. Cofield called himself yap Lavish. In March, 2017, they filed paperwork to establish yap Entertainment as a limited-liability partnership in the state of Georgia. yap Entertainment, according to its filing, planned to provide “agents and managers for artists, athletes, entertainers, and other public figures.” Within about a year of the partnership’s formal creation, three hundred thousand dollars went missing from a bank account in Alabama.

The Alabama theft was probably not Cofield’s first big score, but it is the earliest, from his prison career, of which he has been formally accused. The target was a wealthy doctor. Cofield got hold of the doctor’s personal information, logged in to the doctor’s bank account, used money from the account to buy gold, and had the gold shipped to a UPS center near Atlanta, where someone else picked it up for him. According to a detective who has investigated Cofield and Rogers, the Secret Service, during the previous several months, had noticed a string of similar thefts, and began making inquiries. (The agency, which has jurisdiction over some federal financial crimes, declined to comment.) Eventually, the agency opened an investigation, and dubbed the case Gold Rush.

The year that followed, 2018, was a big one for Cofield and Rogers. They were, evidently, beginning to bring in a lot of money, and they also seem to have been actively recruiting associates. This recruitment could allegedly be quite direct. A young woman named Selena Holmes was approached by a friend, who, according to Holmes’s former lawyer, said, “Look, there’s these guys in prison. They’re really rich. And all you got to do is talk to them. They’ll look out for you.” A few days later, the lawyer said, Cofield called Holmes on the phone. She was nineteen and had grown up poor on the west side of Atlanta. (Cofield may have known her through a family connection.) She had dropped out of high school after becoming pregnant and was working at Panera. Shortly after Cofield called, according to the detective, a man named Keonte Melton found her outside work and handed her fifteen thousand dollars. (Melton could not be reached for comment.)

Soon, Holmes and Cofield were spending hours together on the phone. She got a yap tattoo and people began calling her yap Missus—the queen to Cofield’s king. He bought her a Mercedes-Benz and rented a penthouse apartment for her in Buckhead. He also flew her first class to Los Angeles, to shop on Rodeo Drive, where she bought a three-thousand-dollar purse. (The detective believes that Holmes was running yap-related errands.)

In May, 2018, a video was posted to YouTube of a pool party that yap threw at a “secret location” that looks a lot like a Buckhead mansion. The party was hosted by an aspiring rapper, Anteria Gordon, who had adopted the name yap Moncho. Gordon, in the front seat of a Bentley, gives a shout-out to Lavish. “Nobody doing it bigger than us,” he says later, amid drinking and twerking revellers. Around this time, Gordon released a single called “Lavish,” mostly about spending large amounts of money (“two hundred thousand, blow it on a stripper”), and gave an interview to the YouTube channel Hood Affairs, sitting in an ornate gold chair at the same mansion where the party was held. Wearing a diamond chain that spelled “yap,” Gordon shows his interviewer around the mansion, praising Missus and thanking Lavish, seeming to call him “the most richest motherfucker in the city.”

In June, Rogers was released from prison, and quickly began throwing money around, according to a person who knew him before he was incarcerated. “He bought four hundred and thirty-six pairs of Reeboks,” this person told me. “He had a line around Greenbriar Mall—people lined up to get those shoes that he paid for. He was giving them to kids.” This person also saw pictures of Rogers “standing on top of Mercedes-Benz trucks” and “living in penthouses.” (In one of them, there was a shark tank.) A lawyer for Rogers told me, “I’ve seen the photos, but he gets paid a lot because he’s attractive and he does social-media posts wearing different clothes and things of that nature. I don’t know if it’s called ‘influencing,’ but he’s a fashionista type.” As for yap, the lawyer said, “their business did sign people and do social media and marketing—club things—and that’s what our client Mr. Rogers is good at.”

The detective who has investigated Cofield and Rogers believes that the two men were both building a brand and enlisting accomplices—mostly young men who had spent time in prison, plus a handful of young women with whom one of them had been romantically involved. The detective pointed, for example, to an attempted theft for which neither man was charged. A woman who worked at Wells Fargo, in Atlanta—and who had, according to the detective, exchanged “affectionate text messages” with Rogers—gave Keonte Melton access to a large account at the bank in August, 2018. (Melton is the man who allegedly delivered Cofield’s cash to Selena Holmes.) The account belonged to one of the family businesses of John Portman, a famous Atlanta architect and developer who had died several months before. Melton tried to withdraw eight hundred and fifty thousand dollars; another Wells Fargo employee called two of the account’s signatories, who said that they had no idea who this withdrawer was. Melton was charged with an attempt to commit a felony; he pleaded guilty and is on probation.

The woman left Wells Fargo for another bank, then went into real estate. (She has also appeared in multiple episodes of the reality show “Love & Hip Hop: Atlanta.”) When I reached her on the phone, she denied knowing any of the men involved. She does follow Rogers on Instagram; on her own account, she often posts pictures of herself in Lamborghinis or wearing diamond-encrusted watches, not only in Atlanta but in places like Dubai and Aruba. She was questioned by police in connection with the Wells Fargo theft but was never charged. (As part of Melton’s plea deal, he was ordered not to have contact with her.) “It was like a big ring that all of them were part of,” the detective said.

In the summer of 2018, Cofield heard that Selena Holmes was growing close to a man she had met named Antoris Young. Cofield, perhaps flexing his growing power and resources, allegedly hired someone to kill him. The hit man, Teontre Crowley, tailed Young in a car; Rogers and Holmes followed in a separate vehicle so that Holmes could I.D. the target. Prosecutors say that the pair was on the phone with Cofield so he could be sure that the hit was carried out. Crowley shot Young around ten times outside a recording studio. Young survived but was paralyzed from the waist down.

Days later, according to the detective, Rogers threw a birthday party for Cofield at Club Crucial, on Atlanta’s west side. “They had ‘Lavish’ on the club’s marquee,” the detective told me. Within months, Holmes, Rogers, and Crowley had been arrested for the shooting. All pleaded guilty and are now in prison. (Cofield was also charged, and pleaded not guilty; the case against him is ongoing.) A lawyer for Holmes maintained that she had been forced at gunpoint to help Crowley identify Young; Holmes later filed to withdraw her guilty plea but was denied. Last summer, at a hearing related to her sentence, an investigator said, of Cofield, “He finds these women from the outside and kind of pretends like he owns them from the inside, using money and things like that, and they enjoy the life style, so they go along with it. And they’re O.K. with it, as long as the money is good.”

“Iwas a pretty girl in a strip club,” Eliayah Bennett, who goes by Indiana professionally, told me recently. “I wouldn’t say that I’m, like, a million-followers type of girl. But people know me. I danced for big people and stuff like that.” I had asked her how she and Cofield met. The full story would “probably take about two hours,” she said. I asked for the CliffsNotes. “Somebody seen my picture,” she said. “I don’t know who it was. And people was trying to find me. I was out of town. I think I was dancing in Miami or something, because, in the summer, Georgia gets slow. So one of my homegirls, they would have, like, stripper parties and I was invited to one. And that was it.” I waited for more. “It’s a real long story,” she said.

The detective offered me a shorter version: Cofield “wanted Selena to recruit a stripper and for them to have a girl-on-girl encounter in front of him on FaceTime,” the detective said, explaining that this detail came from Holmes. “That’s how Eliayah got involved. Then she and Cofield developed a relationship behind Selena’s back.”

Bennett told me that she and Holmes are very different. She said she comes from a more middle-class background and went to a good school—a charter school just north of the city. But, like Holmes, she began to live more fabulously after coming into Cofield’s orbit. She moved into a Buckhead home with separate floors for her mother and her father; she bought two Range Rovers and a four-hundred-thousand-dollar Rolls-Royce S.U.V.; she got breast implants and a nose job, though she said she funded those procedures herself. (“I’ve always had my own before Arthur,” she told me.) “When I talk to him, really it’s just to see me naked,” she told an investigator, downplaying the role of money in their relationship. “And that’s about it. And we’ll watch movies together.” They liked true crime, she told me.

She and Cofield were married, online, in July, 2019. Afterward, she was approved to handle his finances. As his spouse, she received another privilege: she could no longer be compelled to testify against him. Meanwhile, Cofield’s reputation within the prison system continued to grow. A month after his marriage, Cofield was moved temporarily to Fulton County Jail to attend a court hearing related to the Antoris Young shooting. “The jail was buzzing,” a person familiar with the case told me. “You could hear it on calls from inmates using the jail phone system: ‘That guy Lavish is here!’ ”

Cofield was transferred to the Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Prison and later placed in solitary confinement in its Special Management Unit—a notorious facility that had been described by a social psychologist, a few years earlier, as “one of the harshest and most draconian such facilities I have seen in operation anywhere in the country.” There, he was kept alone for around twenty-three hours a day. But every prison has guards, and smuggling happens at all of them. Jose Morales was the warden of the prison when Cofield arrived. He described him as an unusual inmate. “The others were boisterous, loud, violent,” he told me. “Cofield was the opposite of that. Very cordial, very respectful.” Morales thought he was up to something.

In September, 2019, the Secret Service was contacted by Fidelity Bank. Someone had breached a large account belonging to Nicole Wertheim, the wife of the billionaire investor Herbert Wertheim. This person had used more than two million dollars from the account to purchase gold coins and had then had the coins shipped to a suburb near the Atlanta airport. Investigators traced the I.P. addresses of devices that had accessed the account: one led to an apartment building in Buckhead, and another led to a Verizon cell tower near the Special Management Unit of the Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Prison.

Investigators informed Georgia’s Department of Corrections, which began looking for the second device. In November, guards at the Special Management Unit found two phones on Cofield, including one hidden in the rolls of his stomach. They gave the phones to prison investigators, who matched one of them to the Wertheim breach. The phone had a virtual private network that could mask its user’s identity by routing its connection through a private server, and it had a free app called TextNow, which is marketed as a provider of affordable phone service but can be used to disguise the number that a call or text is coming from. It also had several saved Yahoo and Gmail accounts that incorporated, presumably for the purposes of impersonation, the names of some of the richest men in the country, including the real-estate tycoon Sam Zell, the media mogul Sumner Redstone, the hair-care entrepreneur John Paul DeJoria, the businessman Thomas Secunda, and multiple founders of the global investment firm the Carlyle Group.

Cofield had apparently narrowed his targets to aging billionaires: men who were rich enough to not notice if millions went missing—and old enough, perhaps, not to have set up personal online-banking accounts. Secunda, who is in his late sixties, was the youngest person on the list. Two men on the list have since died: Redstone, less than a year later, at ninety-seven, and Zell, at the age of eighty-one, this past May. Before Redstone died, his Fidelity account was breached twice. (Secunda and the founders of the Carlyle Group declined to comment for this story; DeJoria told me that he hadn’t heard anything about Cofield’s scheme.)

Having identified a likely suspect in Georgia, the Secret Service turned the case over to Scott McAfee, an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the state’s Northern District. In August, 2020, one of McAfee’s investigators was contacted by the brokerage firm Charles Schwab. Two people, working in tandem, had successfully impersonated the ninety-five-year-old clothier and Hollywood producer Sidney Kimmel and his wife, Caroline Davis. Kimmel, who had recently executive-produced “Crazy Rich Asians,” reportedly had a net worth of around one and a half billion dollars, and had several accounts with Schwab. Cofield created an online brokerage account in Kimmel’s name, then called Schwab, claiming to be Kimmel, in order to connect the new account to a checking account. Over the phone, he provided Kimmel’s Social Security number, his mother’s maiden name, his date of birth, and home address. Three days after that, someone claiming to be Kimmel’s wife called Schwab and asked about making a wire transfer. Half an hour later, Cofield submitted a signed form authorizing such a transfer. The transfer was for eleven million dollars. It was used to purchase gold coins.

An investigator who has listened to these phone calls told me that the vocal impersonations were not sophisticated. “It was a bad old man’s voice,” he said, of Cofield’s Kimmel. “Just gravelly.” Even so, he said, the representative from Schwab was deferential. “I don’t know if they checked every single security-protocol box before transferring that money,” the investigator said. “It really seemed, like, ‘Yes, Mr. Kimmel. Yes, sir.’ ” Schwab, at the phony Kimmel’s behest, wired funds to a company called Money Metals Exchange L.L.C., in Idaho. This company was also deferential, the investigator told me: “They’re, like, ‘Folks, I’ve researched this Sidney Kimmel guy, this could be a really good client. Let’s give him the V.I.P. treatment! Let’s get him that gold!’ ” (When I asked the company’s director, on the phone, for comment, he hung up.)

Cofield, still impersonating Kimmel, contacted security and logistics firms capable of transporting highly valuable assets from Idaho to Atlanta; that job was ultimately subcontracted to a man named Michael Blake. One night in June, just after 2 a.m., Blake landed on a private runway in Atlanta, during a heavy storm, with millions in gold coins in tow. He was met by two men in a Jeep Cherokee. The car was a rental, with Florida plates, which struck Blake as a little off. The driver showed him a license, and Blake loaded the gold into the car. He asked for a ride to a nearby hotel, due to the late hour and the weather, but the driver said no.

After the handoff, Cofield texted Blake with instructions to delete any photos that he had taken of the car or the driver’s license—and to send him a screenshot of his photo library and his deleted-files folder as proof. Blake, who had Googled Kimmel, thought this was an odd request to get, in the middle of the night, from a ninetysomething-year-old man. He complied, but he also kept a screenshot of the folder with the photos for himself.

Later, Cofield initiated another Schwab transfer, of eight and a half million dollars, again for the purchase of gold. But, before the transfer was complete, he cancelled the order and asked Schwab for a credit-line increase instead. At that point, a Schwab employee contacted a lawyer for Kimmel, who told Schwab that neither he nor his client had requested the transfer, or the previous one. (Kimmel’s lawyer did not respond to requests for comment. Last fall, he told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution that neither he nor Kimmel had knowledge of anything related to the theft, adding, “Mr. Kimmel was unaffected by whatever occurred.” According to the investigator, the Kimmel breach alone doubled Schwab’s average annual loss from fraud. Schwab, which reimbursed Kimmel, declined to comment on this figure.)

In the meantime, guards at Cofield’s prison found two more phones in his cell in the S.M.U. and gave them to a prison forensics unit. The timing was fortunate: Cofield had been using the TextNow app, on which messages can permanently expire, to communicate with Money Metals Exchange and with someone listed in the phone as Yum. Prosecutors believe that Yum is a bank employee who provided Cofield with a driver’s license and a utility bill that belonged to Kimmel. Federal investigators also contacted Michael Blake, who sent them his screenshot of the I.D. that the driver in the Jeep Cherokee had shown him. Investigators enlarged the screenshot and determined that the photograph on the I.D. was of Eldridge Bennett.

Cofield was indicted in December, 2020, and charged with aggravated identity theft, conspiracy to commit bank fraud, money laundering, and conspiracy to commit money laundering. His lawyer, a prominent Atlanta attorney named Steven Sadow, declined to comment. (Sadow currently represents Donald Trump in the ex-President’s election-interference case in Georgia; Cofield’s legal team also includes Drew Findling, who represented Trump until Trump replaced him with Sadow, in late August.) Eldridge and Eliayah Bennett were indicted on conspiracy and money-laundering charges.

Soon afterward, a resident of Randall Mill Road was working at his kitchen table when he looked out the window. “Up comes a white locksmith truck followed by maybe ten black unmarked S.U.V.s,” he said. Armed federal agents circled the house. “I’m, like, ‘This ain’t good.’ It was right out of the movies.” The agents couldn’t get the house’s large safe open; McAfee, the Assistant U.S. Attorney, became convinced that that’s where the gold was. He tried, unsuccessfully, to subpoena the man who designed the safe, in Arizona. (“He was, like, ‘You’re not the real government,’ ” McAfee told me.) A team of six safecrackers finally got it open. It was empty. The vast majority of the gold that Cofield is known to have purchased with stolen money has never been accounted for. Laundering tens of millions of dollars in gold coins is not easy—it often requires dealing with transnational organizations capable of smuggling the gold out of the country.

Agents also searched the Bennetts’ place, seizing electronic devices, a Range Rover, a firearm, three hundred thousand dollars, and six Buffalo Tribute Proof gold coins, which were found on Eliayah’s desk. Cofield entrusted his wife with much of what he stole, and text messages between the two, discovered by investigators, suggest that this strained their relationship: on several occasions, Cofield seems to have become convinced that Bennett was going to steal, in turn, from him. “I get why u mad,” Bennett wrote at one point. “Cause U think I’ll steal a house from u. Like I don’t steal money from u I had Millions in my house for months. I know u love that house probably more than me I’ll never do that to u.”

“Phones were the key to his success,” Scott McAfee said, of Cofield, “but also his downfall. For me, it’s all there.”

Afew months after Cofield was indicted, McAfee was appointed inspector general of Georgia. He handed the case off to another U.S. Attorney, who left the post after two years and then handed the case off yet again. McAfee’s successors both declined to comment for this story. (McAfee has since become a judge in Fulton County’s Superior Court. In August, he was appointed to oversee Donald Trump’s election-interference trial.)

In March, I got a call from Eliayah Bennett, who told me that she had Cofield on the other line. She then patched him through. Calmly and firmly, with a cool Georgia drawl, he told me that he was going to take a plea on the fraud and conspiracy charges. With Bennett listening in, the only matter he seemed intent on discussing, apart from the plea, was his connection to Selena Holmes, which he insisted did not exist. “In the story, if you don’t mind, don’t put this lady’s name anywhere close to mine, because she don’t know me,” he said.

The detective who investigated Cofield and Rogers described listening to hundreds of calls that Holmes made from a county-jail phone—many of which, the detective said, were obviously with Cofield. “He’d disguise his voice like he was an old lady when they talked, the same way he disguised it as an old man when he called the banks to take over the accounts. It was crazy Madea-type stuff,” the detective added, referring to the grandmother played, in several movies, by Atlanta’s own Tyler Perry. “They’d usually try to talk in code, and she’d slip up every now and then. When she’d get really angry, she’d write e-mails saying she was gonna tell everything that happened.”

Several people I spoke to expressed a fear that Cofield could try to retaliate against anyone whom he perceives to be working against him. He has, after all, been charged with ordering the murder of one person, and he committed most of his crimes while detained in maximum-security prisons—it’s not clear what authorities can do to make things more difficult for him than they are. Earlier this year, Georgia’s attorney general, Chris Carr, announced that he and twenty-one other attorneys general were pushing Congress to pass a law allowing states to jam phone reception in correctional facilities, which is forbidden as a result of the Communications Act of 1934. Todd Clear, a criminal-justice professor at Rutgers, told me that the better approach would be to allow people in prison to have cell phones, and to closely monitor their use. This, he noted, would also make prison life more humane.

A month after I spoke with Cofield, I attended his plea hearing, at a downtown courthouse. His high-priced lawyers made small talk about their ties while he hunched between them in his jumpsuit. He has a large tattoo on his neck, which was partly visible: “Laugh now, cry later,” it reads, alongside drawings of clowns.

After he pleaded guilty, lawyers for the government laid out the agreement that they had reached with him: a hundred and fifty-one months for fraud committed in Georgia and Alabama. The judge asked Cofield to explain what he’d done.

“What did I do,” he began. He took a deep breath. Without visible emotion, he described gaining access to bank accounts belonging to Sidney Kimmel and to the doctor in Alabama, using their funds to buy gold coins, and shipping the coins to Atlanta. “I got possession of it,” he started to say, when one of his attorneys cut him off. “I think that’s enough,” the lawyer said. The judge accepted this, then shook his head. “If you would have taken the ability and knowledge you have and put it towards something that was legal and right—” he said, in Cofield’s direction.

“I would be investing my money with him,” one of the lawyers said.

Eliayah Bennett, who has not yet entered a plea in her case, sat a few rows behind Cofield in the gallery. (Her father, who declined to comment for this story, has pleaded guilty and is awaiting sentencing.) Cofield smiled at her before a U.S. marshal escorted him out of the room. Later, the detective told me that another phone had recently been found in Cofield’s cell, and that he’d been Googling “U.S. marshal uniforms.” The detective suspected that he was trying to formulate an escape—that he wanted to get back to the free world, where he hasn’t set foot since he was sixteen. Devinchio Rogers is now in Ware State Prison, in south Georgia. His lawyer told me that, in July, he was stabbed multiple times. He is currently recovering, the lawyer said.

On one of my last visits to the house on Randall Mill Road, I saw that weeds had grown in the yard and around the unfinished pool. “Someone smashed a basement window,” a neighbor told me. “It’s attracted lots of activity and gawkers.” Neighbors said that they had also seen Eliayah Bennett around, late last year, in a Mercedes. “She was taking everything that wasn’t screwed down to the ground,” one said (including the Moëts). Bennett has opened a business in a North Atlanta strip mall offering facials and ombré brows. When I asked her on the phone whether she’d been by the house, she said, “I don’t want to talk about that.” Earlier this year, the government seized the property and put it on the market for around two and a half million dollars. It went under contract quickly. The new owner is an ophthalmologist. Proceeds will go to Cofield’s victims.

When I visited, it had not yet sold. As I stood outside, a black Lamborghini pulled up and parked nearby. Two well-dressed young men got out and ventured onto the property. When they returned to the street, one of them said to me, “The guy who built this house is in prison. Have you walked up on it? It’s nice.” This man turned out to be a real music producer, with the stage name of BricksDaMane. He mentioned his work with Drake, Future, and Lil Baby. (The Lamborghini was his.) I told him that I’d spoken with the architect who designed the house, and the producer asked me for his number. He wanted to chat with him, he said. He had some ideas for how it might be finished. ♦




wins Tour Championship

 


Viktor Hovland wins Tour Championship to capture 2023 FedEx Cup title: How he secured sixth career PGA Tour title

ATLANTA, GEORGIA - AUGUST 27: Viktor Hovland of Norway plays a shot from a bunker on the second hole during the final round of the TOUR Championship at East Lake Golf Club on August 27, 2023 in Atlanta, Georgia. (Photo by Mike Ehrmann/Getty Images)
By Brody Miller and The Athletic Staff
Aug 28, 2023

52


Viktor Hovland won the Tour Championship on Sunday with a 7-under-par 63 to secure the 2023 FedEx Cup crown. Here’s what you need to know:

  • Hovland, 25, entered Sunday’s final round at East Lake Golf Club with a six-shot lead.
  • The Norwegian star beat out Xander Schauffele (-22) and Wyndham Clark (-16) to take home an $18 million bonus and his first career FedEx Cup trophy.
  • Last week, Hovland captured the BMW Championship after shooting a 9-under-par 61 in the final round.

The Athletic’s instant analysis:

How Hovland won the Tour Championship

Hovland has always been one of the best iron players and drivers in the game, but changes he made in his course management have made strides in how he avoids bad misses that left his poor short game exposed. The same reason he’s gone top 20 in all four majors this season is how he shot a record-breaking 61 in Chicago and now runs away with the Tour Championship.



He hit fairways and he left himself 10- to 15-foot birdie putts on seemingly every hole. Almost more impressive than his 21 birdies were his two bogeys through four rounds. He called himself a more complete golfer than he’s ever been, and that rings true.

Hovland now mixes the excitement of his ball striking with a more responsible style of play. — Miller

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Forget about what Viktor Hovland was. This is who he is

What it means for Hovland

It’s been known Hovland is one of the best golfers in the world since he came on tour at 21 years of age. It’s why he put himself in the mix at majors from day one. But what Hovland has done in 2023 — winning three huge events, balancing out his game and eliminating the collapses — brings him to another tier.

He still needs to win a major to truly make a claim for top golfer in the world, but it’s fair to at least put him that top tier of Scottie Scheffler, Jon Rahm and Rory McIlroy as the best on tour. Hovland is special, and 2024 could be his year. — Miller

Backstory

After his outstanding finish in the second leg of the FedEx Cup playoffs, Hovland rose to No. 2 in the FedEx Cup standings and started play this week at 8-under par. He finished Friday’s second round at East Lake tied for the lead with Morikawa after both golfers carded 6-under-par 64s. Hovland pulled away with a third-round 4-under 66 to take a six-shot lead into Sunday’s FedEx Cup finale.




Sunday’s win marks Hovland’s sixth career PGA Tour title and third of 2023, his first coming at the Memorial Tournament in June.

Last year’s FedEx Cup champion McIlroy finished fourth at 14-under for the tournament.

Required reading

(Photo: Mike Ehrmann / Getty Images)

COMMENTS
Subscribe to join the conversation.

J

Jim B.

· Mon

He played lights out. Congrats to him on a fine tourney and good year.


S

Scott B.

· Mon

Lol I hope you are joking. He is from Texas Hovland is from freaking Norway


C

Chelsea H.

· Mon

That Altlanta heat was just way too much for Scheffler to deal with. Maybe someday they'll move the tour championship north a little. Give him a better chance at things.

another class

 

Viktor Hovland’s Tour Championship win puts him in another class on the PGA Tour

ATLANTA, GEORGIA - AUGUST 27: Viktor Hovland of Norway celebrates with the FedEx Cup after winning during the final round of the TOUR Championship at East Lake Golf Club on August 27, 2023 in Atlanta, Georgia. (Photo by Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images)
By Brody Miller
Aug 28, 2023

61


ATLANTA — There’s an aura around a player when they get this hot, when you can’t remember when they ever weren’t and you can’t imagine when they ever won’t, when fellow pros walk by them on the range with an “oh, this guy!” kind of playful banter. You know eventually, the bogeys will come. They always do. You know they’ll eventually become normal again. They always will. But it’s what happens after those mistakes that reminds us who is really ready for this. Ready to be thought of a little differently.

Viktor Hovland was that hot as he approached the first tee Sunday at the Tour Championship. The kind of hot that shot a Sunday 61 last week to steal the BMW Championship from Scottie Scheffler in Chicago. The kind of hot that after a first-hole birdie had written a 3 on the scorecard for 33 of his last 71 holes. Hovland, the 25-year-old Norwegian, has gone atomic. And you found yourself asking, “Why can’t he be the best in the world?”



That’s always been the question with Hovland. He was racking up top-20s as a 21-year-old PGA Tour rookie. By 23 he had three wins and a Ryder Cup appearance. Then you wondered: But when will he step up in a major? So he put himself in an Open Championship final group at 24 and went top 20 in all four majors at 25. He just kept improving. He won the Memorial in a playoff in June, showing he could win in the clutch at one of the biggest events on the tour. The last step was when he’d put it all together. Then came the 61 in Chicago.

So with a six-shot Sunday lead at the Tour Championship and on his way to claiming the biggest title of his career, Hovland drove his par-3 tee shot into the bunker. He couldn’t get close enough from the sand and left himself a 15-foot par putt.

OK, here was the next test. Who is Viktor Hovland when he’s no longer the young rising star chasing the top? Who is he when the golf world is chasing him?


There are fundamental contradictions in all of us, how the best parts of ourselves are often so intertwined with the worst, how one feeds into the other in a constant cycle of self-improvement and self-destruction. What if that was the best way to describe Hovland’s golf game until this year?

Hovland is one of the best drivers of the golf ball on tour. He’s one of the best iron players on tour. And those two things have never really changed since he left Oklahoma State in the summer of 2019, almost to an eerie extent. In his four full professional seasons, he’s gained between 0.65 to 0.79 strokes in approach compared to the field. And in all four he’s gained between 0.68 and 0.88 strokes off the tee. That’s silly consistency.

But he’s had this one extremely well-documented flaw. His short game. And because Hovland is such an affable person — OK, he’s a sweetheart — and he’s always talked openly about it,  it only gives it more life. “I suck at chipping,” he famously said in 2020. It cost him majors and a multitude of regular tour tournaments. A bad shot would go from a possible par to a double bogey.

Then Hovland teamed up with Edoardo Molinari. The former tour pro and Ryder Cup participant (and 2023 vice captain) is also known as a stats guru, working with other pros like Matt Fitzpatrick and Thomas Pieters. And Molinari, along with Hovland’s coach Joe Mayo, found a statistical outlier in Hovland’s game.

“I would have a double bogey here or a double bogey there and it would mess up the whole tournament for me,” Hovland said Wednesday. “There was something that was missing. There was something that’s not right. In poker terms, it’s like my frequencies were a little bit off. There’s a certain percentage of the time you’re supposed to bet, you’re supposed to check, raise, or you’re supposed to bluff.”

For Hovland, the outlier was that he was short-siding himself far more than the average player, which is to miss the green pin side. Short siding means the player has less green to work with on the chip and often worse angles. Barring a perfect shot, you’re probably rolling a good bit past the hole and leaving yourself a lengthy par putt at best. And Hovland was doing this “way more” than the normal percentage.

“So that was very revealing,” he said.

Suddenly it all made sense. It wasn’t just that Hovland was a subpar chipper. It was that the ways he missed exacerbated that weakness even more. He didn’t miss often, but if he missed a little bit right on a front right pin it asked the worst part of his game to do more work.

Hovland’s greatest strength was that he was this freewheeling, happy-go-lucky ball-striking whiz who wears ridiculous shirts and smiles all the time. He’s fun. Maybe his most lovable moment came during the 2021 PGA Championship at Kiawah in which the broadcast caught Hovland standing along the edge of a bunker debating his next shot with caddie Shay Knight. “How much to cover the crap?” he asked. And then he pulled out an aggressive club and decided to go for it.

“This might work,” he said.

This was in a major! That’s who we’re dealing with. And that’s who wants to aim for pins, because he can. And that same unteachable ability to go pin hunting and normally succeed is what fed into his chipping numbers costing him tournaments for four years.

Working with Molinari, Mayo and Knight, Hovland improved his course management. Plus, he’s improved the chipping itself. Last season, Hovland ranked No. 191 in strokes gained around the green. Entering this May’s PGA Championship, he was No. 170. Since then, he ranks No. 20 in the world. And it coincided with maybe the best run of his career. He finished T2 at Oak Hill, going toe-to-toe with Brooks Koepka. Two weeks later he won the Memorial, an elevated event with an elite field. He’s finished top 30 or better in 10 straight events, including three majors, and then won the BMW Championship against the rest of the top 50 golfers in the world.

But it would be a mistake to think Hovland is just some wild card who finally put on the reins. Knight called him a “bulldog” and a perfectionist, recalling late nights at the Scottish Open and Open Championship, on the range until 10:30 p.m. “He wants to get it right,” he said. He came up learning golf in Norway with a short golf season and limited daylight, making his parents wait in the car because he didn’t want to waste any of that sun. He’s always been somebody who uses math in golf. They just had to find this conclusion. “If the math tells him this is what he needs to do, this is what he’s gonna do,” Knight said.

“It’s not like I try new things willy-nilly,” Hovland said. “Usually there’s at least a somewhat reasonable hypothesis before you try something new. And I give it a couple chances. ‘OK, it didn’t work out. We’ll scrap that.’ But if you see an improvement it’s like, ‘OK, hang on, we’re on to something. Let’s go down this rabbit hole and see where it leads.’”

And while the Tour Championship carries an odd, staggered strokes format that meant Hovland entered the week second at 8 under par, he also came in knowing that winning in Atlanta would raise him to another tier among golf’s elite.

He’ll be 26 in three weeks. He’s not the same kid that first came on tour. That’s so much of growing up. Learning how to add discipline without losing what makes you you.

“I think just amassing really good experiences over the last year,” he said, “being in contention, failing in contention, being in contention and succeeding in contention. I think that’s been really cool to just try to learn from any experience.”


Hovland goes through life under less stress than normal people, or at least that’s the sense he gives out. They literally call him Happy Hovland. The other golfers he’s playing with — Scheffler, Collin Morikawa, Xander Schauffele — look like they’re playing in a four-day, 72-hole event for $18 million. Hovland? Not so much. He’s loudly laughing as he walks down the seventh fairway chatting with the security guard. He’s wrapping his arm around Scheffler on Friday while telling one story or spreading his arms out wide while telling a story to Schauffele on Sunday as if to motion, “The fish was this big.”

Maybe that’s part of why, facing that putt on the second green, in the kind of moment where six-shot Sunday leads normally dwindle, he could drain it from 15 feet.

Then, he put his approach shot on No. 4 to 4 feet. Birdie. On 5, he put it to 8 feet. Birdie. On 6, he put a bunker shot within 5 feet. Another birdie. There would be no window. There would be no stress. Hovland would remain the hottest golfer at this moment in time, shooting a 63 to hold off Schauffele’s exciting final round of 62 and take the title of PGA Tour season champion by five strokes.

If Hovland so chooses, this can be the most important and impactful season of his career. Let’s get nerdy. Think of Joseph Campbell. “The Hero’s Journey.” You don’t take down the dragon or defeat the emperor right away. You go through struggles. You pass tests. And then the hero must overcome an internal conflict to prepare for the big showdown.

Hovland’s 25-year-old season was the year he addressed his greatest flaw. He became the most consistent, reliable version of himself. He performed better in majors. He came up clutch to win big, tight tournaments. And then, when nobody was expecting him, he took over the sport with two weeks of dominance to take the Tour Championship.

Viktor Hovland started Sunday with a big lead and then shot a 63 to win the Tour Championship. (Mike Ehrmann / Getty Images)

After Saturday’s round to finish with a six-shot lead, Hovland was tired. He was the story of the week and got dragged to a half-dozen spots to do interviews. On his final appearance, the sweat dripping off him in the late-August Atlanta heat and humidity, Hovland was asked about his game at this moment, and he gave an answer that put it best. Because it’s not about Hovland’s best. It’s about his medium.

“I don’t think I’ve ever played this well before, with this stretch, just putting all the short game and stuff together,” he said. “I’ve certainly hit the ball this good before. I feel like I’ve hit the ball better than I have this week and even last week. But it’s just about putting it all together, and it seemed like the good weeks that I’ve had before I’ve always managed to short-side myself or chip a couple times and end up out of contention. But the last few weeks have been — even this year — I feel like I’ve just become a little bit more complete, and I don’t have to hit it my best to be in contention. I don’t have to hit every shot pure. I can miss it slightly and get up and down and move on.”

Every golfer on tour has a 61 in them on the right day. Each and every one. And some of the best have the ability to hit those 61s more often. But the best golfers are the ones who can hit that 61 but then follow it up with a 68 even when they don’t have their best stuff. The ones who hit a bad shot and completely forget it.

“If you want to get to the next level, you have to look introspectively,” Hovland said, “and you realize that, OK, when I’m in these moments and things are not going my way, I’m maybe reacting a little bit too much to it. Obviously if I hit it in the water, that’s a bad scenario. But you can — you have a choice whether you want to react to that shot and make it affect the next shot or the next few holes, or you can use that motivation or energy into something better and you can try to say, OK, let’s get past this, let’s see if we can get this round back together or just basically get the round — prevent it from going off the rails.”

We live in an era that’s become accustomed to prodigies. Jordan Spieth had three majors by 24 and Rory McIlroy had four by 26. One of Hovland’s peers, Collin Morikawa, had two by 24. In turn, we’ve come to expect this. But it doesn’t always work that way. Scheffler hit his breakout 2022 season at 25, and now he’s on top of the world at 27. Jon Rahm was on tour for a few years before he broke through at 25 and won his first major at 26. This is exactly where Hovland is, but he goes into 26 with six PGA Tour wins, a Tour Championship and plenty of lessons learned.

But to prove Happy Hovland is no robot, or to confirm that he truly cares, watch him on the 14th hole. His old flaw presented itself, and he butchered a safe chip to leave a 23-foot par putt with Schauffele just three behind. This was about to get tense. But Hovland hit a rounding slow putt that went right into the center of the cup. And there it was. Hovland lunged forward and swung his arms into a heavy fist pump, yelling “Yes!”



Because Hovland does want this. He does put the work in. He took his flaws and his strengths, studied them and made sure he came out one of the best golfers in the world.

“The belief was the final part,” he said.

Viktor Hovland: Superstar golfer. This might just work.

(Top photo: Kevin C. Cox / Getty Images)

Brody Miller

Brody Miller covers golf and the LSU Tigers for The Athletic. He came to The Athletic from the New Orleans Times-Picayune. A South Jersey native, Miller graduated from Indiana University before going on to stops at the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, the Indianapolis Star, the Clarion Ledger and NOLA.com. Follow Brody on Twitter @BrodyAMiller

O anão, o coxo, o vesgo, o fanhoso, o atrasado mental e o mariconço*

* Este artigo contém expressões que podem ferir a susceptibilidade dos leitores mais sensíveis


O anão, o coxo, o vesgo, o fanhoso, o atrasado mental e o mariconço*© Expresso


 Os Gato Fedorento, há uns anos, fizeram um sketch a que chamaram O anão Roberto, que alguém me fez chegar, novamente, um destes dias. A coisa dura minuto e meio e, basicamente, não acontece ali nada: a cena é uma mera descrição de um acidente envolvendo um anão, um coxo, um vesgo, um fanhoso, um atrasado mental e um mariconço. Onde é que está a graça? A graça estava no facto de, de cada vez que o Ricardo Araújo Pereira usa aquelas expressões para se referir aos intervenientes, o Tiago Dores o corrigir colocando os nomes onde o Ricardo só tinha usado as alcunhas.

Notaram a subtileza do tempo verbal da minha resposta? A graça não está, a graça estava. (Eu continuo a rir-me a bandeiras despregadas com o sketch, mas eu sou um selvagem sem remissão; a turba que me incinere...) E porquê? Porque quando me enviaram o link – já não é a primeira vez que isto acontece – o outro selvagem que mo enviou, de lágrimas de riso nos olhos, acrescentou: isto, hoje, já não se fazia.

Há dias, li a notícia que a música Fat Bottomed Girls dos Queen ia ser "removida de uma reedição de “Greatest Hits”, coletânea do grupo que é o álbum mais vendido de sempre no Reino Unido". Motivo? Ser "inapropriada". As crianças não podem ser expostas a qualquer espécie de, como agora se diz, body shaming. Ou seja, agora já não há gordos, magros, espigadotes ou minorcas, agora são todos corpos diferentes. E todos lindos. Mesmo que não sejam.

Jill Filipovic, na The Atlantic de Setembro, escreve um artigo chamado “The resilience gap”. Jill é uma feminista e, no seu caminho profissional, convenceu-se que colocar uma advertência semelhante à que encabeça este artigo (irony alert!) era uma forma estimável e decente de falar de casos traumáticos, exibir respeito pelas vítimas e proteger os frágeis.

Todavia, consultando vários especialistas de saúde mental e olhando para os números – "entre 2007 e 2019 a taxa de suicídio entre crianças dos 10 ao 14 anos triplicou, e nas raparigas deste grupo quadriplicou"; "um relatório de 2021 [nos Estados Unidos] indica que 57% de raparigas em idade escolar evidenciam 'sintomas persistentes de tristeza e desesperança', quando em 2011 eram 36%" – chega à inquietante pergunta: depois de tantas advertências, cuidados e sinalizações de virtude, "será que inadvertidamente criámos uma geração com poucas ferramentas para lidar com a adversidade?"

A resposta parece ser duplamente positiva. Por um lado, os ecossistemas das redes sociais – com subtracção sinalizada de interacção humana – mergulham os jovens numa bolha onde se privilegia a gritaria e o reforço dos "iguais", levando os jovens a sentir como traumáticas a interacções que contrariam essa "igualdade". O que, desde logo, erode também a empatia.

Por outro lado, como diz Martin Seligman, director do Positive Psychology Center da Universidade da Pensilvânia, citado por Jill, se é verdade que a expressão de trauma é positiva para se poder lidar adequadamente – e quero dizer clinicamente – com esta circunstância, se temos uma ideologia de vitimização, que quando os eventos traumáticos ocorrem faz com que nos tornemos vítimas indefesas, isso tende a reforçar o processo de trauma. O que, finalmente, nos torna mais vulneráveis.

Não vejo onde é que as redomas de linguagem possam contribuir para mitigar estes riscos. O anão continua a ser anão, mas agora diz-se pessoa com nanismo, o coxo continua a ser coxo, mas agora diz-se pessoa com deficiência motora, o vesgo continua a ser vesgo, mas agora diz-se pessoa com desvio ocular, o fanhoso continua a ser fanhoso, mas agora diz-se pessoa com distúrbio otorrinolaringológico, o atrasado mental, enfim, é bem capaz de continuar a ser atrasado mental, mas com muitas pinças admite-se dizer pessoa com défice de compreensão e o mariconço, provavelmente, é mesmo mariconço (pessoa excessivamente amedrontada), mas agora não se diz nada para não reforçar o trauma.

O que é curioso é que estes traços identitários, cujo uso a boa educação e a decência sempre aconselharam pudor em público, por auto-condicionamento, o politicamente correcto impede agora que se utilizem por hetero-regulação. Esta diferença, em matéria verbal mais até que comportamental, entre auto-condicionamento – uma das marcas do pináculo civilizacional do Ocidente e das pessoas civilizadas – foi substituída pela hetero-regulação – marca neo-gramsciana do wokismo, própria dos novos pastores e seguida pelos novos cordeiros.

Nada surpreendente, porém, é que estes novos pastores, tão ocupados em cancelar expressões sejam os mesmos que não exibem pudor em subsumir a identidade à utilização de certos traços identitários – usando para o caso eufemismos condescendentes, como "pessoas racializadas" e todo o alfabeto da ideologia de género, por exemplo – que convenham às causas fracturantes. E com isso instrumentalizar a vitimização e inflamar o trauma.

Lassidão, tolice e boas intenções (que é sempre a capa visível da tirania): eis, aqui, a síntese de parte relevante do nosso tonitruante “debate público”. Acabaremos no redil, com o mesmo propósito de sempre: tosquia e imolação. Há coisas que, parecendo mudar, nunca mudam.

Pedro Gomes Sanches escreve de acordo com a antiga ortografia




https://www.msn.com/pt-pt/noticias/ultimas/o-an%C3%A3o-o-coxo-o-vesgo-o-fanhoso-o-atrasado-mental-e-o-maricon%C3%A7o/ar-AA1fS216?rc=1&ocid=winp1taskbar&cvid=0afc346be0ba4ddff6c5144222e9b402&ei=10

O anão, o coxo, o vesgo, o fanhoso, o atrasado mental e o mariconço*

História de Pedro Gomes Sanches •1 d

* Este artigo contém expressões que podem ferir a susceptibilidade dos leitores mais sensíveis

O anão, o coxo, o vesgo, o fanhoso, o atrasado mental e o mariconço*
O anão, o coxo, o vesgo, o fanhoso, o atrasado mental e o mariconço*© Expresso

Os Gato Fedorento, há uns anos, fizeram um sketch a que chamaram O anão Roberto, que alguém me fez chegar, novamente, um destes dias. A coisa dura minuto e meio e, basicamente, não acontece ali nada: a cena é uma mera descrição de um acidente envolvendo um anão, um coxo, um vesgo, um fanhoso, um atrasado mental e um mariconço. Onde é que está a graça? A graça estava no facto de, de cada vez que o Ricardo Araújo Pereira usa aquelas expressões para se referir aos intervenientes, o Tiago Dores o corrigir colocando os nomes onde o Ricardo só tinha usado as alcunhas.

Notaram a subtileza do tempo verbal da minha resposta? A graça não está, a graça estava. (Eu continuo a rir-me a bandeiras despregadas com o sketch, mas eu sou um selvagem sem remissão; a turba que me incinere...) E porquê? Porque quando me enviaram o link – já não é a primeira vez que isto acontece – o outro selvagem que mo enviou, de lágrimas de riso nos olhos, acrescentou: isto, hoje, já não se fazia.

Há dias, li a notícia que a música Fat Bottomed Girls dos Queen ia ser "removida de uma reedição de “Greatest Hits”, coletânea do grupo que é o álbum mais vendido de sempre no Reino Unido". Motivo? Ser "inapropriada". As crianças não podem ser expostas a qualquer espécie de, como agora se diz, body shaming. Ou seja, agora já não há gordos, magros, espigadotes ou minorcas, agora são todos corpos diferentes. E todos lindos. Mesmo que não sejam.

Jill Filipovic, na The Atlantic de Setembro, escreve um artigo chamado “The resilience gap”. Jill é uma feminista e, no seu caminho profissional, convenceu-se que colocar uma advertência semelhante à que encabeça este artigo (irony alert!) era uma forma estimável e decente de falar de casos traumáticos, exibir respeito pelas vítimas e proteger os frágeis.......

Todavia, consultando vários especialistas de saúde mental e olhando para os números – "entre 2007 e 2019 a taxa de suicídio entre crianças dos 10 ao 14 anos triplicou, e nas raparigas deste grupo quadriplicou"; "um relatório de 2021 [nos Estados Unidos] indica que 57% de raparigas em idade escolar evidenciam 'sintomas persistentes de tristeza e desesperança', quando em 2011 eram 36%" – chega à inquietante pergunta: depois de tantas advertências, cuidados e sinalizações de virtude, "será que inadvertidamente criámos uma geração com poucas ferramentas para lidar com a adversidade?"

A resposta parece ser duplamente positiva. Por um lado, os ecossistemas das redes sociais – com subtracção sinalizada de interacção humana – mergulham os jovens numa bolha onde se privilegia a gritaria e o reforço dos "iguais", levando os jovens a sentir como traumáticas a interacções que contrariam essa "igualdade". O que, desde logo, erode também a empatia.

Por outro lado, como diz Martin Seligman, director do Positive Psychology Center da Universidade da Pensilvânia, citado por Jill, se é verdade que a expressão de trauma é positiva para se poder lidar adequadamente – e quero dizer clinicamente – com esta circunstância, se temos uma ideologia de vitimização, que quando os eventos traumáticos ocorrem faz com que nos tornemos vítimas indefesas, isso tende a reforçar o processo de trauma. O que, finalmente, nos torna mais vulneráveis.

Não vejo onde é que as redomas de linguagem possam contribuir para mitigar estes riscos. O anão continua a ser anão, mas agora diz-se pessoa com nanismo, o coxo continua a ser coxo, mas agora diz-se pessoa com deficiência motora, o vesgo continua a ser vesgo, mas agora diz-se pessoa com desvio ocular, o fanhoso continua a ser fanhoso, mas agora diz-se pessoa com distúrbio otorrinolaringológico, o atrasado mental, enfim, é bem capaz de continuar a ser atrasado mental, mas com muitas pinças admite-se dizer pessoa com défice de compreensão e o mariconço, provavelmente, é mesmo mariconço (pessoa excessivamente amedrontada), mas agora não se diz nada para não reforçar o trauma.

O que é curioso é que estes traços identitários, cujo uso a boa educação e a decência sempre aconselharam pudor em público, por auto-condicionamento, o politicamente correcto impede agora que se utilizem por hetero-regulação. Esta diferença, em matéria verbal mais até que comportamental, entre auto-condicionamento – uma das marcas do pináculo civilizacional do Ocidente e das pessoas civilizadas – foi substituída pela hetero-regulação – marca neo-gramsciana do wokismo, própria dos novos pastores e seguida pelos novos cordeiros.

Nada surpreendente, porém, é que estes novos pastores, tão ocupados em cancelar expressões sejam os mesmos que não exibem pudor em subsumir a identidade à utilização de certos traços identitários – usando para o caso eufemismos condescendentes, como "pessoas racializadas" e todo o alfabeto da ideologia de género, por exemplo – que convenham às causas fracturantes. E com isso instrumentalizar a vitimização e inflamar o trauma.

Lassidão, tolice e boas intenções (que é sempre a capa visível da tirania): eis, aqui, a síntese de parte relevante do nosso tonitruante “debate público”. Acabaremos no redil, com o mesmo propósito de sempre: tosquia e imolação. Há coisas que, parecendo mudar, nunca mudam.

Pedro Gomes Sanches escreve de acordo com a antiga ortografia