Monday, November 2, 2026

They arrested me

 


Dear Jorge Cardoso,

 

They arrested me and deported me from France because I say what millions only dare to think:We need remigration.

 

That is the short answer. The longer one is that I was in the country to speak, to sign books, and to stand with French patriots who are organizing against the ethnic replacement of their own people. The authorities decided that was enough. Wanting secure borders, the return of those with no right to stay, and the protection of European culture and Christian heritage is now treated as a threat.

 

I was not arrested for violence. I was not arrested for crime. I was removed because the message of remigration is spreading and the elites have no answers or arguments.

 

When governments open the borders, tolerate parallel Islamic societies, and watch riots, gang terror, and the destruction of European cities, they still find the energy to target the people who name the problem and demand the solution.

 

They claimed that I pose a “genuine, present, and sufficiently serious threat to public order”, while mobs are destroying the inner city of Paris. I am now banned for life from the whole territory of France. Only in 5 years is the state obliged to evaluate whether I am still a “threat” to public order.

 

There is a strategy behind it and it's called “Mao's tactic”: punish one severely and educate millions. If they can do this to me for calling for remigration, they will do it to organisers, volunteers, and ordinary citizens who refuse to stay silent. I am the canary in the coal mine.

 

But their repression is backfiring. The same plane that deported me brought in activists of our movement, who are currently on the streets. As Victor Hugo said: you can stop an army from crossing a border, but no army can stop an idea from crossing a border. They sent me and my book back, but now all of France is talking about remigration! It is already a big success for our movement.

 

But only if we can now take the opportunity and inform the masses, who want to hear more about our movement and remigration.

 

So I am out. The work is not. Support the organisers who are still on the ground. Share the petition. Become a monthly donor so the movement has the resources to keep operating even when the state tries to shut down individual voices.

 

 






Hamas controla o seu partido

 


https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=4573095496267910&set=a.1659475230963299






10 min 
O Erro Involuntário e a Sombra da História: O Preço do Silêncio no Ocidente
O recente deslize da equipa de Elif Eralp, ao devolver acidentalmente ao jornal Der Spiegel um rascunho com notas e comentários privados, abriu uma fenda alarmante na fachada da política contemporânea em Berlim. Ao tentar suprimir declarações sobre o activista radical pró-Palestina Ibrahim Ibrahim — figura associada a fações extremistas como a Frente Popular para a Libertação da Palestina (PFLP) e apologista de líderes do Hamas —, a candidata de Die Linke à liderança do governo municipal expôs um medo paralisante: "Não posso colocar-me a mim e à minha família em perigo pelo Der Spiegel".
Este episódio transcende o mero embaraço partidário ou um debate tóxico sobre a segurança na capital alemã. Ele serve como um aviso severo e um eco desconfortável de dinâmicas históricas que o Ocidente teima em ignorar.
A complacência ou o receio de confrontar radicalismos em nome de alianças tácticas ou de uma tolerância mal calculada encontra um paralelo inequívoco no Irão de 1979. Naquela época, os movimentos e partidos de esquerda iranianos apoiaram ativamente a subida ao poder do Ayatollah Khomeini, movidos pela ilusão de uma frente unida contra o regime anterior. O desfecho dessa aliança de conveniência foi imediato e trágico: assim que o poder foi consolidado, o novo regime teocrático promoveu purgas violentas, prisões em massa, tortura sistemática e o assassinato daqueles mesmos esquerdistas que tinham viabilizado a sua ascensão.
A relutância de líderes democráticos ocidentais em denunciar o extremismo islâmico e os seus simpatizantes infiltrados em movimentos sociais arrisca pavimentar um caminho semelhante. Quando uma das principais figuras políticas de Berlim admite publicamente que a ameaça à sua integridade física dita o que pode ou não ser dito na imprensa, a soberania do Estado de Direito curva-se perante o terror psicológico.
A história tende a repetir-se quando as lições do passado são tratadas como notas de rodapé. Se o Ocidente continuar a silenciar os seus próprios democratas pelo medo, as fações radicais que hoje são toleradas ou temidas nos bastidores serão as primeiras a silenciar permanentemente as liberdades que as acolheram.
Ver menos





Saturday, October 31, 2026

Mary Bauermeister

 



10 things to know about Mary Bauermeister

From her role in the Fluxus movement to her lens boxes, gardens and explorations of science and mysticism, discover the pioneering artist’s unconventional life and work 

Words By Emilie Murphy
On the left is a shadow box with glass and reflective elements, and on the right, a woman holds a glass sphere.

Left: Mary Bauermeister (1934-2023), Al-tavola, 1969. Box construction — painted wood, ink, glass, lenses, wooden sphere, wooden objects, stones, plastic straws. 30¼ x 30¼ x 7⅝ in (76.4 x 76.1 x 19 cm). Offered in the Post-War and Contemporary Art Day Sale as part of Herbert Lust: Collector, Scholar, Friend on 20 November 2026 at Christie’s in New York. Artwork: © 2026 Mary Bauermeister / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York / VG Bild-Kunst, Bonn. Right: Mary Bauermeister in 1965. Photograph by Hans Namuth. Courtesy Center for Creative Photography, University of Arizona © 1991 Hans Namuth Estate

The Second World War had a profound impact on her worldview

Mary Bauermeister was born in Frankfurt am Main, Germany, in 1934. After war broke out, she and her older brother, Martin, were evacuated to a mountain town near the border of Austria. Bauermeister has credited this experience with informing her unconventionality: ‘I was a war child,’ she told curator Hans Ulrich Obrist in a 2014 interview. ‘From the age of 10, I’d conspired against adults.’

Bauermeister eschewed a traditional path in order to pursue her art. She studied at Hochschule für Gestaltung, a school of design in Ulm, before attending the State School for Arts and Crafts in Saarbrücken. She ultimately dropped out and settled in Cologne as an independent artist.

Mary Bauermeister (1934-2023), Nature Mort, 1967-1969. Wood box construction — ink, offset print, glass, optical lenses, wood, felt-tip pen, stones and found objects. 39¼ x 47½ x 13¾ in (99.7 x 120.7 x 34.9 cm). Offered in the 20th Century Evening Sale as part of Herbert Lust: Collector, Scholar, Friend on 17 November 2026 at Christie’s in New York

Her Cologne studio became a meeting place for the avant-garde

From 1960 to 1961, Bauermeister rented a top-floor studio at Lintgasse 28 in Cologne. The studio became a meeting space and concert hall for experimental artists working across media. These gatherings attracted a wide circle of Bauermeister’s friends, including video artist Nam June Paik, dancer and choreographer Merce Cunningham and installation artist Christo.

It was during one such performance that Paik leapt into the audience and cut off the composer John Cage’s necktie. These events earned Bauermeister the moniker Mutter der Fluxus-Bewegung, or ‘Mother of the Fluxus movement’. Less a fixed aesthetic than a community of like-minded creatives, Fluxus was rooted in rebellion and a desire to blur the boundaries between art and everyday life.

Bauermeister (far right) rehearsing a performance piece, accompanied by fellow Fluxus artists Karlheinz Stockhausen, David Tudor, Hans G. Helms and Christoph Caskel. Photo: The Stockhausen Foundation for Music

Music shaped her way of thinking

Her parents’ respective fields of science and music — her father was a professor of genetics and anthropology, her mother a singer — would become powerful influences on Bauermeister’s work.

She was interested in musical theory and sought to translate the underlying principles of composition into her visual art; she also wove musical references into her compositions such as line drawings of piano keys and torn score sheets.

In Bauermeister’s first museum exhibition, held at the Stedelijk Museum in Amsterdam in 1962, her work was accompanied by a day-long performance of electronic music by pioneering composer Karlheinz Stockhausen. He and Bauermeister would later marry and have two children together. The couple divorced in 1972.

Mary Bauermeister (1934-2023), Cross Out, 1967-1968. Wood construction, glass, straws, ink, wood, metal handle, lenses and mixed media. 76 x 63 in (193 x 160 cm). Offered in the Post-War and Contemporary Art Day Sale as part of Herbert Lust: Collector, Scholar, Friend on 20 November 2026 at Christie’s in New York

She blurred the bounds between mathematics, science and mysticism

Rather than separating disciplines such as science and spirituality, Bauermeister was fascinated by the relationship between seemingly disparate fields. She looked for order amidst chaos, finding a sense of cosmic wonder in the patterns repeated throughout nature.

Mathematics and the natural world converge across her practice. She organised certain compositions according to the Fibonacci sequence, and in her lens boxes, numerical equations appear alongside stacks of stone. Later in her career, she turned more explicitly towards the mystical, using the spiritual method of geomancy to inform her compositions.

Her lens boxes turned looking into an experience

A defining element of Bauermeister’s body of work is her lens boxes, the idea for which materialised in the form of a dream. ‘I dreamt that each of my paintings was a walk-in space,’ Bauermeister told the museum director Willem Sandberg. ‘I essentially walked into my paintings, and so later I started to build boxes.’

These boxes are miniature worlds filled with ink and pencil drawings, found materials, painted rocks and more. The front glass covers are dotted with magnifying lenses of varying sizes, playing with perspective and perception.

After the first lens boxes were exhibited at Bonino Gallery in New York in 1964, they quickly became her most sought-after works. Bauermeister continued to engage with the series throughout her life, constantly revisiting the format’s rich possibilities.

Installation view of Mary Bauermeister: paintings and constructions, featuring Nature Mort (illustrated), Bonino Gallery, New York, April 1970. Artwork: © 2026 Mary Bauermeister / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York / VG Bild-Kunst, Bonn

Her practice took on a new dimension in New York

In 1962, Bauermeister moved to New York as the contemporary art scene shifted from abstraction to Pop Art, Minimalism and experimental mediums. While there, she became represented by the leading Bonino Gallery and grew acquainted with figures like Robert Rauschenberg and Niki de Saint Phalle.

Her move to New York also gave her an international platform and seeded some of her most influential works. She was gaining traction at an institutional level, with The Museum of Modern Art acquiring several of her works throughout the 1960s and The Whitney Museum of American Art acquiring her lens box Homage to Marbert Du Breer (1964) in 1965.

Her body of work defies characterisation

While Bauermeister is often associated with Fluxus, she refused to work within the confines of any one movement or medium, instead considering how apparently separate things may be connected. She explored experimental music, abstraction, sculpture, painting, drawing, installation and performance art alongside a deep engagement with the natural world.

Describing her practice, she has said: ‘I only followed an inner drive to express what was not yet there, in reality or thought. To make art was more a finding, searching process than a knowing.’ Rather than offering fixed answers, her work invites the viewer to remain curious and question what they see.

Open link https://www.christies.com/en/lot/lot-6614206?ldp_breadcrumb=back
A surreal mixed-media artwork featuring faces, hands, a shoe, circular patterns, and textured surfaces.

Mary Bauermeister (1934-2023), Variation on Quentin Metsys, 1969. Stones, ink, wood, photographs, brush, paint and sand on particle boards. 35¼ x 36½ x 3½ in (89.1 x 91.7 x 8 cm). Offered in the Post-War and Contemporary Art Day Sale as part of Herbert Lust: Collector, Scholar, Friend on 20 November 2026 at Christie’s in New York

Quentin Metsys, Le prêteur et sa femme, 1514. Oil on panel. 71 x 68 cm. Musée du Louvre, Paris

Natural materials were a central element of her compositions

Natural materials such as stones, sand and seagrass became a central component of her oeuvre. In a 1967 interview, Bauermeister explains, ‘I was never interested to make a drawing of a stone, but to include what is the experience of something natural in a piece of art — not the imitation, or let’s say the illusion, but the thing itself.’

Her stone works probe the mathematical patterns found in nature. Using stones sourced from around the world, Bauermeister would organise them into meticulous patterns sequenced by size. Taken together, these works illuminate an important throughline of her practice: that nature captivates in its orderliness as much as in its beauty.

She turned gardens into works of art

After nearly a decade in New York, Bauermeister returned to Germany and settled in Rösrath-Forsbach, where she would live for the rest of her life. Her home was surrounded by a large garden, inciting her engagement with nature to expand from individual materials to the landscape itself. She held gatherings, performances, readings and discussions there, creating a creative environment that operated in parallel to her former Cologne studio.

Bauermeister used water, crystals and stones as visual touchstones throughout her gardens, and incorporated these elements into many of her garden commissions. Throughout the 1970s and 1980s, Bauermeister executed several large commissions, including projects for Landeszentralbank Wiesbaden, a rooftop garden for Kölnische Rückversicherung in Cologne and an interior garden for the Federal German Foreign Office in Bonn.

The garden at Bauermeister’s home and studio in Rösrath-Forsbach, Germany, full of lenses and prisms reflecting the light. She moved to the home in 1968. Photo: Eva Oertle

The garden at Bauermeister’s home and studio in Rösrath-Forsbach, Germany, full of lenses and prisms reflecting the light. She moved to the home in 1968. Photo: Eva Oertle

Her oeuvre is commanding new attention

Since Bauermeister’s passing in 2023 at the age of 88, her diverse body of work has been revisited by scholars and collectors. Long overshadowed by the male artists around her, she is increasingly being recognised as a major figure in her own right.

Her institutional profile is rising, and she has been included in recent group exhibitions at the Seattle Art Museum, the Neue Galerie in Kassel and The Whitney Museum of American Art. The current exhibition Inner Worlds: Visions from the Hirshhorn Collection in Chicago places her work alongside Yayoi Kusama and Niki de Saint Phalle, and the preparation of a catalogue raisonné by the Mary Bauermeister Art Estate adds another important layer of scholarly validation. Together, these developments point to an artist whose significance is still being recalibrated.

Sign up for Going Once, a weekly newsletter delivering our top stories and art market insights to your inbox