P D R

 

https://publicdomainreview.org/essay/science-of-sound/?utm_source=newsletter

https://publicdomainreview.org/collection/gerrit-schouten-suriname-dioramas/?utm_source=newsletter

https://publicdomainreview.org/collection/le-brun-human-animal-hybrids/?utm_source=newsletter

https://publicdomainreview.org/collection/earth-bathing/?utm_source=newsletter

Czechia Rebels Against Open Borders

 

https://europeanconservative.com/articles/news/we-will-not-be-governed-by-eu-incoming-czech-government-rejects-migration-pact/?mc_cid=279ea0e591&mc_eid=3cbf6e7152

 

Wednesday 22 October   Driving the day...  Czechia is following in the footsteps of Poland and Hungary. In Prague, the country’s incoming coalition government is preparing to reject the EU’s Pact on Migration and Asylum—particularly the “solidarity mechanism,” which forces member states to either take in a quota of migrants or pay cash. This marks a clean shot across Brussels’s bow.  Karel Havlíček, deputy leader of the sovereignist ANO party, declared: “We will not be governed by the European Union. We will respect certain rules that apply there, but we are accountable to our voters.” On top of this, the SPD—ANO’s coalition partner—has suggested implementing harsher rules around residence permits, as well as revoking the residency permits of any foreigner who commits a crime.  In taking such a stance, Czechia joins other Central European nations in pushing back against the European Union’s control and its obsession with open borders. Hungary has also requested to opt out of the migration pact, meanwhile Polish president Karol Nawrocki has written to European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen to be exempt from what he called “the EU’s “illegal migrants relocation project.”  The European Commission has threatened to take legal action against states that refuse to implement the pact. And it certainly has form when it comes to punishing the likes of Hungary and Poland for their ‘disobedience.’ Czechia will have to decide whether incurring Brussels’s wrath is better or worse than the consequences of uncontrolled mass migration.  By Lauren Smith     COMMENTARY The Irish Won’t Let Ireland’s Immigration Problem Be Ignored LAUREN SMITH Last night’s anti-migrant protests erupted into violence. Why won’t the political establishment confront the cause? Read more...   IN OTHER NEWS...   “We Will Not Be Governed by EU”: Incoming Czech Government Rejects Migration Pact ZOLTÁN KOTTÁSZ The Andrej Babiš-led cabinet will follow in the footsteps of Hungary and Poland. Read more... ‘Patriots of Diversity’: A Leftist Trap? HÉLÈNE DE LAUZUN Despite all proclamations of intent, being French cannot be invented or decreed. Read more...   Merz Migration Remarks Spat Shows Establishment Coalition Can’t Work MICHAEL CURZON The chancellor didn’t say too much about German “cityscapes”—he didn’t say enough. Yet his own party is losing its head, anyway. Read more... It’s Still East … and West Germany F. ANDREW WOLF, JR. If East Germans had not felt—and rightly so—that for too many years, all decisions were made by West Germans, less estrangement would likely have resulted. Read more...     > CLICK HERE TO EXPLORE MORE CONTENT     The Forge with Harrison Pitt | Ep. 14: Thatcher Debate | Charles Moore & Will Clouston In this episode of The Forge, Harrison hosts a debate on Margaret Thatcher's life and legacy to mark the Iron Lady's centenary. Lord Charles Moore believes that Thatcher saved Britain through principled leadership and urgent economic reforms. William Clouston counters that, in treating Britain too much like a profit-seeking enterprise, she did abiding damage to social cohesion and national identity. Who is correct?     SUBSCRIBE TO OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL     > Did you receive this from a friend? Click here to subscribe to our newsletter! FOLLOW US ON     www.europeanconservative.com   Want to change how you receive these emails? You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.