Tuesday, October 19, 2021

cruel paradox of Linda Evangelista’s fate

 

The cruel paradox of Linda Evangelista’s fate

Caixa de entrada

The New York Times nytdirect@nytimes.com Anular subscrição

14:45 (há 16 minutos)
para mim
   
Traduzir mensagem
Desativar para mensagens em: inglês

The former supermodel Linda Evangelista recently alleged that she was “brutally disfigured” by a cosmetic procedure intended to freeze away fat cells. CoolSculpting, she claimed in a lawsuit, had instead left her with unsightly and unnatural fat deposits, a rare side effect known as paradoxical adipose hyperplasia.

But the real paradox of the story is that middle-aged women are expected to look 30 years younger than they are, writes Rhonda Garelick in Face Forward, a new column.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this message because you signed up for updates from The New York Times.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018










Supermodel Linda Evangelista Says Cosmetic Procedure Left Her ‘Disfigured’

The ’90s-era supermodel said side effects from a fat-freezing procedure caused her to become depressed and turned her into a recluse after “not looking like myself any longer.”

Linda Evangelista modeling in 1992.
Credit... Julio Donoso/Sygma via Getty Images

Linda Evangelista, the supermodel made famous in the 1990s, said she had become “brutally disfigured” and “unrecognizable” after a cosmetic body-sculpting procedure that had turned her into a recluse.

In an Instagram post on Wednesday, she referred to filing a lawsuit, saying that she was taking “a big step towards righting a wrong that I have suffered and have kept to myself for over five years.”

She added: “To my followers who have wondered why I have not been working while my peers’ careers have been thriving, the reason is that I was brutally disfigured by Zeltiq’s CoolSculpting procedure which did the opposite of what it promised.”

Ms. Evangelista, 56, said that after the fat-freezing procedure she developed paradoxical adipose hyperplasia, a side effect in which patients develop firm tissue masses in the treatment areas.

She said the cosmetic procedure left her “permanently deformed even after undergoing two painful, unsuccessful, corrective surgeries.” She said she had not been told of the risk.

“PAH has not only destroyed my livelihood, it has sent me into a cycle of deep depression, profound sadness, and the lowest depths of self-loathing,” she wrote. “In the process, I have become a recluse.”

  • Thanks for reading The Times.
Subscribe to The Times

Ms. Evangelista, who was known as one of the five top supermodels in the 1990s, detailed her story on Instagram, where she has 912,000 followers and where thousands of people commented or expressed support. Her story was also widely covered in international and national media outlets.

[Related: What is CoolSculpting?]

Ms. Evangelista filed a lawsuit on Tuesday against Zeltiq Aesthetics Inc., in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The suit said she was seeking compensatory damages of $50 million for her distress and loss of work, promotions and public appearances.

Representatives for the company did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Thursday. A lawyer for Ms. Evangelista was not immediately available for comment.

The lawsuit said Ms. Evangelista had seven treatments from August 2015 through February 2016 to break down fat cells in her abdomen, flanks, back and bra area, inner thighs, and chin. Within a few months, she developed “hard, bulging, painful masses under her skin in those areas,” it said, and was given a diagnosis of PAH in June 2016.

The filing said her quality of life, her career and her body “were all ruined in 2016 after she was permanently disfigured” by the procedure and the multiple attempts at corrective surgery that followed.

“Ms. Evangelista enjoyed a wildly successful and lucrative modeling career from 1984 through 2016, until she was permanently injured and disfigured by Zeltiq’s CoolSculpting System,” the lawsuit said.

The suit accused the company of having “intentionally concealed” the risks or “failed to adequately warn” about them, and said Ms. Evangelista developed depression and a fear of going outside.

Ms. Evangelista had full body liposuctions after the diagnosis by a doctor referred to her by Zeltiq in 2016 and 2017, but the procedures were unsuccessful and resulted in scarring, the lawsuit said.

“Ms. Evangelista was promised a more contoured appearance; instead, the target fat cells actually increased in number and size and formed hard, bulging masses under her skin,” it said.

According to CoolSculpting, its procedure has been cleared by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of visible fat bulges.

In response to questions, the F.D.A. said in an email that it could not comment on litigation, but that it was “committed to ensuring medical devices are safe and effective and that patients can be fully informed when making personal health decisions.” It said that it monitors reports from consumers of adverse events after a device reaches the market and would “take action where appropriate.”

Cryolipolysis, the name of the nonsurgical fat-freezing procedure, uses cold temperature to break down fat cells, according to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

It is mostly used by patients who want to reduce a specific fat bulge that they have been unable to diminish through other means. Generally, the area of concern is “vacuumed” into the hollow of an applicator, where it is subjected to cold temperature.

The surgeons’ society said the complication rate was low, with less than 1 percent of patients who may develop paradoxical fat hyperplasia, which is an unexpected increase in the number of fat cells. The side effect is more common in men than in women, the society said.

Ms. Evangelista also said that the public scrutiny of her appearance had harmed her emotionally. “I have been left, as the media has described, ‘unrecognizable,’” she said.

Jonah E. Bromwich contributed reporting.

Christine Hauser is a reporter, covering national and foreign news. Her previous jobs in the newsroom include stints in Business covering financial markets and on the Metro desk in the police bureau. @ChristineNYT






...|...



What Is CoolSculpting?

The supermodel Linda Evangelista claims in a lawsuit that the fat-freezing procedure left her “disfigured.” Here’s what experts say it is supposed to do and what the most common side effects are.

Credit...Getty Images

On Wednesday, Linda Evangelista, the ’90s-era supermodel, shared on Instagram that she had been disfigured by a fat-reducing procedure called CoolSculpting that did the opposite of what it promised: Instead of reducing the amount of fat she had, CoolSculpting increased it, she said.

After treatment, Evangelista said, she developed a condition known as paradoxical adipose hyperplasia, or P.A.H., in which the tissue in the treated area grows larger and hardens and stays that way. P.A.H. is sometimes referred to as the “stick of butter effect,” because it can look like a stick of butter hidden under the skin; the enlarged tissue matches the long, thin shape of the CoolSculpting applicator.

“P.A.H. has not only destroyed my livelihood, it has sent me into a cycle of deep depression, profound sadness, and the lowest depths of self-loathing,” Evangelista wrote. She filed a lawsuit on Tuesday against Zeltiq Aesthetics Inc., the subsidiary of Allergan that markets and licenses CoolSculpting devices, claiming that the company had “intentionally concealed” the risks and had “failed to adequately warn” consumers, including Evangelista, about them.

CoolSculpting is an outpatient treatment, approved by the Food and Drug Administration, that is designed to kill fat cells near the surface of the skin by cooling them in a process known as cryolipolysis. Scientists first proposed the idea behind the technique in 2008, based in part on the existence of a rare phenomenon that afflicts kids, called Popsicle panniculitis. When some young children suck on Popsicles, their cheeks develop permanent divots because the cold damages nearby fat cells. Similarly, doctors had noticed in 1980 that when women go horseback riding in the cold, they sometimes lose fat around their thighs.

CoolSculpting isn’t intended to help people lose significant amounts of weight, though. “This is not a weight-loss treatment,” said Dr. Paul M. Friedman, a dermatologist in Houston and the director of the Dermatology & Laser Surgery Center there. It “is meant for stubborn pockets of fat that are nonresponsive to diet and exercise in patients who are at their ideal body weight,” he said.

Sign up for the Well newsletter, for Times subscribers only.  Essential news on health, fitness and nutrition, from Tara Parker-Pope. 

Licensed by Zeltiq Aesthetics, CoolSculpting can be administered by doctors — usually dermatologists or plastic surgeons. After applying gel to the skin to protect it from damage, the doctor will use special applicators to cool the skin to just above the freezing point in fatty areas such as the chin, the abdomen, the thighs, the arms, the back or underneath the buttocks. The cold, which is administered to the skin for 30 minutes to two hours, “kills off fat cells, without damaging surrounding nerves, muscles, or skin cells,” said Dr. Whitney Bowe, a New York City-based dermatologist.

  • Thanks for reading The Times.
Subscribe to The Times

Over the next one to six months, the fat cells die, Dr. Bowe said, and patients usually see a reduction in fat in the treated areas of about 20 percent; patients will often have two or more treatments to the same area to reduce fat by 40 to 50 percent, eliminating small bulges and giving the area a more toned look. The procedure is not covered by health insurance, and treatment regimens usually range in price from $600 to $3,000, Dr. Bowe said.

More than eight million CoolSculpting treatments had been administered in the U.S. as of 2019, according to the CoolSculpting website. The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery reports that board-certified U.S. plastic surgeons performed 129,686 nonsurgical fat-reducing treatments in 2019, a category that includes CoolSculpting as well as treatments that use ultrasound to kill fat cells. But those numbers do not reflect CoolSculpting treatments done by dermatologists, so the real number is probably much higher.

Compared with surgical techniques such as liposuction, CoolSculpting does not require a long recovery time, so patients who don’t want interruptions to their lifestyles might prefer it. “You can go into the CoolSculpting procedure, and then you can hit the gym later that day,” Dr. Bowe said.

During the procedure, patients may feel a pulling sensation on the skin — most machines use vacuums to hold the skin in place — and the cold can feel uncomfortable until the skin grows numb during treatment. Afterward, Dr. Bowe said, patients sometimes feel a tingling, pins-and-needles sensation as feeling returns to the treatment area.

In the days and weeks after treatment, according to the manufacturer, patients may also experience a litany of temporary side effects including redness, swelling, bruising, firmness, tingling, stinging, tenderness, cramping, aching, itching or skin sensitivity. When patients are treated below the chin, they may also experience a feeling of fullness at the back of the throat. Rare side effects also include frostbite, hernia, dizziness or pain that can last for weeks.

P.A.H., the condition Linda Evangelista now has, is cited by the manufacturer as another rare side effect of CoolSculpting — but recent estimates suggest the risk may be higher than the company says. Zeltiq, the company that licenses CoolSculpting, estimates that P.A.H. develops after one out of every 4,000 CoolSculpting treatments. But in a study published this year, physicians in Canada followed 2,114 patients who had received a total of 8,658 CoolSculpting treatments from 2015 to 2019, finding that P.A.H. occurred after one out of every 666 treatments. And once patients develop the condition, it typically has to be treated with surgical liposuction, but surgery may not eliminate the problem or may introduce new issues. According to her lawsuit, Ms. Evangelista underwent several corrective surgeries, which left her with “immense keloid scarring.”

Newer CoolSculpting models seem safer, however. In the Canadian study, the researchers reported that the risk of PAH was significantly lower — occurring after approximately one out of every 2000 treatments — among patients treated with newer machines, probably because they require shorter treatment times and lower vacuum settings so less force is exerted on the tissue, Dr. Friedman said.

Doctors don’t yet know what causes P.A.H. to develop in some CoolSculpting patients. The statistics suggest that men are at increased risk compared with women, because 55 percent of the patients who developed P.A.H. in the Canadian study were men, even though men typically comprise only about 15 percent of CoolSculpting patients.

As for what happens to the tissue when P.A.H. develops, that’s also unclear. It’s possible that as the body tries to repair the damage from CoolSculpting, it recruits other cells or turns on repair mechanisms that result in tissue growth, Dr. Bowe said. “But we don’t really fully understand why it happens.”

A version of this article appears in print on Sept. 30, 2021, Section D, Page 3 of the New York edition with the headline: CoolSculpting Goes Under the MicroscopeOrder Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe

No comments:

Post a Comment