MARTIN
R. ANDERSON, 65, squints to appreciate the geometry of paintings at the
museum. Kate Davis, 24, says the sunlight that bounces off museum walls
and onto the art can’t be reproduced. Stan Kaplan, 65, flies across the
country just to see a Leonardo da Vinci drawing “more beautiful” than
the Mona Lisa. And an elderly woman posts to Facebook a selfie of
herself beside a masterwork, presumably commencing an avalanche of
social-media approval.
These were observations collected during a summer at New York City’s “newest” museum, the Met Breuer,
an outpost of the Metropolitan Museum of Art that opened in March in
the former home of the Whitney Museum of American Art. There’s not much
theatrical about the scenes — unlike, say, the one that featured two
teenagers in San Francisco who placed eyeglasses on the floor of an art
museum so they could watch tourists gather around their “installation”
with fascination. But taken together, they are a gauge — imperfect and
impressionistic — of what draws people to museums and what they see when
they get there. They are reflections of the times, too, reminders that
art is digested in ways it wasn’t. Art rewards internalization, but
distractions surround us. Cultural critique is instant, impulsive, and
travels virally.
We
tried to find out what goes on in the mind of the modern museumgoer,
unscientifically, by staking out the Met Breuer and interviewing nearly
50 art gazers over the course of two months, their pensive moments
pierced by our questions as they peered at works. The setting was the
Breuer’s big inaugural exhibition “Unfinished: Thoughts Left Visible,”
as provocative a springboard for opinions as any. It focuses on the
notion of “unfinished” art and does so broadly, displaying works that
were never finished, works that are intentionally incomplete (non
finito), and art that prompts conceptual discussion about what is
complete, like a Jackson Pollock drip painting. The two-floor exhibition
— which ends its six-month run next weekend — spans the 1400s to today
and features artists as varied as Titian, Andy Warhol and a teenage
Pablo Picasso.
As
for those interviewed, they included students who said museums were
like “eating your vegetables” and romantics who cherish their lunch
breaks, when they can hop in a cab to go steal a few quiet minutes in
front of a beloved painting they have already gazed at dozens of times
before.
A
handful of works in particular generated the most comment (a deathbed
portrait of an artist’s mistress, a painting of someone being skinned
alive) and common themes emerged over time (the ubiquity of technology,
people’s short attention spans).
Here’s what museumgoers said.
Martin R. Anderson, 65, Boston, body work therapist and artist
The artwork: “James Hunter Black Draftee” (1965) by Alice Neel
Continue reading the main story
Mr. Anderson’s take: “He probably did get killed because his family would have heard about this painting and said something by now.”
Another perspective: “When I saw this image in the advertisements, I saw it as contemporary, like an album cover.” — Steve Wolkwitz, 25, a student
Debi Kops, 69, New York, tour guide
The artwork: “Self-Portrait With Wig” (1898-1900) by Pablo Picasso
Continue reading the main story
Ms. Kops’ take: “He was probably drunk.”
Continue reading the main story
Another perspective: “I didn’t know it was a Picasso. And then like, whoa. It’s a Picasso.” — Normandie Syken, 20, an illustrator
William Meyerhofer, 50, New York, psychotherapist
The artwork: “Untitled I-VI (Green Paintings)” (circa 1986) by Cy Twombly
Continue reading the main story
Mr. Meyerhofer’s take: “I want to hate it, but it’s so good.”
“It’s awful algae green. But you can’t deny it. It grabs you. But part of me thinks it is so crude.”
The artwork: “The Flaying of Marsyas” (probably 1570s) by Titian
Mr. Meyerhofer’s take:
“It’s so violent and awful. My husband would say, ‘I wouldn’t want this
on the wall of my living room.’ This must have been the equivalent of a
horror movie back in the day.”
Another perspective: “You’re
imagining what is he going to do with that knife. The bucket: Is it
enough to hold? And his eyes — he can see the pain coming.” — Stan Kaplan, 65, Los Angeles
Holly Campbell, 22, Melbourne, Australia, art history student
The artwork: “The Vision of Saint John” (1609-14) by El Greco
Continue reading the main story
Ms. Campbell’s take: “It could have been a blue sky, but maybe it was going to be dark and stormy.”
Another perspective: “It’s so modern. And what’s with these crazy babies floating around?” — William Meyerhofer
Michele Miozzo, 50, New York, neuroscientist
The artwork: “Head of a Woman (La Scapigliata)” (1500-5) by Leonardo da Vinci
Continue reading the main story
Mr. Miozzo’s take:
“This is unfinished, but you can see the psychology of a character. It
forces you to think what is in the mind of this young woman. It makes me
think, Who was she? What was she thinking?”
Another perspective: “I think about how much more beautiful she is than the Mona Lisa.” — Stan Kaplan
Another perspective: “You need to see this one with your own eyes. No reproduction I’ve seen comes close to this.” — Martin R. Anderson
Jinny Choi, 21, Seoul, studying English literature at New York University
The artwork: “You or Me” (2005) by Maria Lassnig
Continue reading the main story
Ms. Choi’s take:
“It made me think about women in Korea, where I read that the suicide
rate is [very high]. For some reason, I thought about that.”
Another perspective: “This is brave. She’s old. She’s overweight. Think about how courageous this is.” — Michele Miozzo
Kate Davis, 24, New York, assistant for an art foundation
The artwork: “Cart Full of Action” (1986) by Cady Noland
Continue reading the main story
Ms. Davis’ take:
“I don’t like this. I think the question is not even if it is finished
but is this even art? I could see this in a parking lot.”
Another perspective: “This is what the artist is putting into the world. Nothing is a waste of space.” — Tony White, 29, Louisville
Nilza Oliveira, 65, and her daughter Michelle Oliveira, 36, Rio de Janeiro
The artwork: “Gardanne” (1885-86) by Paul Cézanne
Continue reading the main story
Michelle Oliveira’s take: “The
curious thing to me is why are these unfinished. What better thing did
Picasso or Cézanne feel they needed to go and do? Grab a coffee? Go kiss
a girl?”
Nilza Oliveira’s take:
“An artist is never finished so their art is never finished. When you
finish it, you kill it. Leaving it unfinished, you keep it alive.”
August Scotch, 22, graphic design student at Pratt Institute
The artwork: “Bouquet of Peonies in a Green Jar” (1898) by Paul Cézanne
Continue reading the main story
Mr. Scotch’s take: “Those
empty spaces could be light. If you put more there, it’s almost too
much information. Like this it is allowed to breathe.”
Another perspective: “There are only a few strokes here. But I can tell the petals feel velvet.” — Michele Miozzo
Continue reading the main story
No comments:
Post a Comment